Results,
Conclusions, and Recommendations:
The following table shows the results for all test and all settings.
|
All Results |
||||||||
|
Configuration |
Single Drive |
RAID 0 with 2 Drives |
RAID 0 with 4 Drives |
|||||
|
Drive |
WD |
Maxtor |
WD |
Maxtor |
Maxtor |
WD |
Maxtor |
Maxtor |
|
ATA/UDMA |
100/5 |
133/6 |
100/5 |
133/6 |
133/6 |
100/5 |
133/5 |
133/6 |
|
Interface |
IDE |
HPT
374 |
TX/4 |
HPT
372 |
Dynamic |
TX/4 |
HPT
374 |
Dynamic |
|
HDTach 2.61 |
||||||||
|
Disk Access Time in milliseconds |
13.7 |
11.6 |
14.0 |
11.7 |
N/a |
13.9 |
10.3 |
N/a |
|
Read Spead average in MB/sec |
24.3 |
35.1 |
30..3 |
50.7 |
N/a |
41.2 |
42.4 |
N/a |
|
Write Speed average in MB/sec |
20.0 |
20.4 |
26.,5 |
27.6 |
N/a |
31.6 |
35.0 |
N/a |
|
CPU utilization in % |
3.2 |
7.8 |
12.8 |
24.8 |
N/a |
18.9 |
25.3 |
N/a |
|
Winbench 99 (2.0): Disk Inspection Test |
||||||||
|
Disk Access Time in milliseconds |
9.36 |
8.82 |
10.9 |
8.43 |
12.5 |
10.1 |
8.3 |
14.4 |
|
Transfer Rate Average in MB/sec |
33.7 |
41.8 |
44.4 |
57.7 |
62.0 |
54.6 |
68.8 |
63.9 |
|
CPU Utilization in % |
3.84 |
5.99 |
13.8 |
25.9 |
27.5 |
42.1 |
68.1 |
65.1 |
|
Winbench 99 (2.0): High End Disk Mark |
||||||||
|
Weighted Suite |
21,500 |
24,900 |
34,600 |
48,400 |
35,400 |
43,300 |
52,900 |
45,400 |
|
AVS Express |
17,500 |
31,700 |
39,200 |
48,100 |
42,100 |
54,300 |
56,300 |
52,500 |
|
Front Page 98 |
170,000 |
148,000 |
193,000 |
308,000 |
195,000 |
292,000 |
301,000 |
254,000 |
|
Microstation SE |
30,000 |
48,300 |
38,500 |
68,000 |
51,700 |
63,500 |
56,800 |
54,000 |
|
Photoshop 4.0 |
10,400 |
11,900 |
18,300 |
14,800 |
14,900 |
14,000 |
18,400 |
16,000 |
|
Adobe Premier 4.2 |
19,600 |
25,800 |
28,000 |
56,800 |
37,100 |
32,600 |
62,000 |
47,300 |
|
Sound Forge 4.0 |
32,600 |
29,900 |
54,400 |
147,000 |
49,000 |
76,000 |
171,100 |
73,800 |
|
Visual C++ 5.0 |
24,200 |
21,700 |
36,900 |
80,200 |
38,300 |
56,200 |
81,500 |
62,400 |
|
ZD Content Creation 2001 |
||||||||
|
Score |
76.9 |
81.5 |
87.0 |
96.8 |
85.1 |
96.2 |
99.8 |
89.0 |
We observed huge differences between single test runs with Winbench99 as shown in the screenshot below with the results of the 10-test run with 4 Maxtor D740X on the HPT 374 RAID controller in RAID 0. The subtests of the High-end Disk Mark suit are running only for a rather short time. This is obviously resulting in the observed fluctuations. We also regard the differences between RAID 0 x 2 and RAID 0 x 4 with the High-end Disk Mark as rather exaggerated, probably due to the same reason. As explained already, the focus of Content Creation 2001 is on audio and video editing. The applications used by Content Creation like Adobe Premier, Adobe Photoshop and Sound Forge are working with much larger files and also running longer than in Winbench 99, and we therefore regard the results with Content Creation as more valid for the evaluation of RAID 0 than Winbench 99.

|
Summarized Comparison ATA 100 versus ATA 133 |
||||
|
|
|
WD400BB |
Maxtor D740X |
|
|
Transfer Rate (Winbench 99) |
Single disk |
33.7 MB/sec |
41.8 MB/sec |
24.0% |
|
Access Time (Winbench 99) |
Single disk |
9.36 ms |
8.82 ms |
5.7% |
|
CPU Utilization |
Single disk |
3.84% |
5.99% |
55.9% |
|
Winbench99 High End Diskmark |
Single disk |
21.5 |
24.9 |
15.8% |
|
RAID 0 with 2 disk |
34,600 |
48,400 |
22.2% |
|
|
RAID 0 with 4 disk |
40,300 |
52,900 |
31.3% |
|
|
Content Creation 2001 |
Single disk |
76.9 |
81.5 |
6.0% |
|
RAID 0 with 2 disk |
87.0 |
96.8 |
11.3% |
|
|
RAID 0 with 4 disk |
96.2 |
99.8 |
3.7% |
|


Raid
0 with 2 drives versus 4 drives:
The
massive performance advantage of RAID 0 with 2 disks over a single
disk, be it ATA 100 or ATA 33, is clearly visible in all scores.
Depending on the application its ranging from 25% in Content
Creation to 50% in the Winbench 99 High-End Disk Mark.
This huge performance gain is in line with the results of a similar
comparison with the same benchmarks at Toms Hardware Guide. A difference
between RAID 0 with 2 disk and RAID 0 with 4 is also visible,
but only ranging between 4% and 10% depending on the hard-disk.
This difference is probably too small for most users to rectify
the much higher cost for 4 harddisks in case somebody is considering
a 4-channel RAID controller only because of the assumed speed
advantage. As explained in the introduction, there are of course
some other good reasons to go for a 4-channel controller. Interesting
is the strong showing of RAID 0 by Dynamic Disk. Its slower
than RAID 0 with a hardware controller, but not very much. Its
the cheapest way to get RAID 0, because its purely software
based (only in Windows 2000 and XP Professional). The drawback
is that the OS cannot be installed within the RAID 0 array. That
means that one advantage of RAID 0 the faster loading of the OS
is not present. We also found that RAID 0 with Dynamic Disk seems
to provide a more even STR diagram than RAID 0 with
a hardware controller. The following screenshots are STRs taken
with the Winbench 99 Disk Inspection Test for RAID
0 arrays with 4 Maxtor D740X disk on the HPT 374 and with Dynamic
Disk.


ATA
133 Maxtor D740X versus ATA 100 Western Digital WB400BB:
The
direct comparison between a single ATA 133 D740X Maxtor and a
single ATA 100 WD400BB shows that the Maxtor disk is in almost
all performance categories ahead of the Western Digitals. Transfer
rates, access time, and most important the scores in applications
are all clearly better with ATA 133. We achieved a transfer rate
of around 41MB/sec with a single ATA 133 Maxtor disk, which is
24% better than the tested ATA 100 Western Digital disks. This
is a very good result and in line with the findings of techchannel.de. Even when running the Maxtors
on an ATA 100 interface we found them to be slightly faster than
the WD400BB (results not shown). The only point where the ATA
100 WD400BB could score was the significantly lower CPU utilization.
The same trend is visible in RAID 0. The tested ATA 133 Maxtor
disks were running applications up to 31% faster in Winbench 99
than their Western Digital counter parts. But again, we regard
the 11.3% difference in Content Creation 2001 more credible. Thats
not enough to be noticeable, when running applications. But faster
is faster, and given the competitive pricing of the Maxtor D740X
series, these ATA 133 are a good choice for somebody who is considering
to upgrade his ATA 66 system. On the other hand, its obvious
that the speed gain is not enough to warrant a change from ATA
100 drives. Although we tested the non fluid-bearing version,
they were running more silent than the Western Digitals and also
cooler. We also liked the activity LED the Maxtors are sporting.
Pricing, performance and features make the Maxtor D740X a good
buy for anybody with an ATA 133 compatible board.


ATA
133 Rocket 404 versus ATA 100 TX/4:
The
ATA 133 Rocket 404 is easy to install, fast, issue free, and comes
with a flexible RAID management utility which offers some interesting
features like the capability of arranging and deleting RAID arrays
from within Windows, e-mail failure notification and a warning
device. It can handle 8 disks and is 30% cheaper than the competing
4-channel controller from Promise. We do recommend the Rocket
404 for any user who is looking for a 4-channel RAID controller.
As already mentioned RAID 0 with 4 disks is faster than RAID 0
with 2 drives, regardless ATA 100 or ATA 133. But the gain of,
for example, 10% in Content Creation is rather small and does
not justify the additional cost for 2 additional disks. The additional
data safety of RAID 0+1 or the storage aspect with JBOD are probably
better reasons for a 4-channel controller than the relatively
small gain in speed. The TX/4 left us with mixed feelings. The
point is not that this ATA 100 controller is slower than the ATA
133 Rocket 404. That was to be expected, as we were comparing
ATA 100 with ATA 133. What counts more is that the TX/4 is apparently
incompatible with the KT266 chipset, has immature drivers, is
only working with 4 devices, has a mediocre RAID management utility,
and lacks support by the manufacturer. We dont recommend
the TX/4 for anybody running a KT266 or KT266A board. And we doubt
that the TX/4, being 30% more expensive, is any longer competitive
against the faster, better equipped, and in our experience issue-free
Rocket 404.
Final
Words:
Maxtor
is marketing their ATA 133 drives as the fastest IDE solution
until serial ATA will replace IDE. Motherboards with serial ATA
support will probably not be available for another year in quantity
and even after their introduction it will take many years until
boards with IDE ports have completely vanished. Until then ATA
133 disks are the fastest IDE solution and the Highpoint 372 and
374 Raid controllers are a good match from them.
![]() DIY Parallel-Cable Remote LCD! |
![]() TwinMOS PC2700 DDR |
![]() MSI K7N420 Pro nForce Motherboard! |